Jason Latimer - LATIMER the world champion of magic

from www.youtube.com
Ref : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T-XoN1Ts6Wg

YouTube - Benelli Shotgun Amazing Shots

from www.youtube.com
Ref : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z5uHt4AwYb4

A Proof by Induction with a Difficulty

from gilkalai.wordpress.com
Ref : http://gilkalai.wordpress.com/2009/07/22/a-proof-by-induction-with-a-difficulty/

By Gil Kalai

 

The time has come to prove that the number of edges in every finite tree is one less than the number of vertices (a tree is a connected graph with no cycle). The proof is by induction, but first you need a lemma.

Lemma: Every tree with at least two vertices has a leaf.

A leaf is a vertex with exactly one neighbor.

Well, you start from a vertex and move to a neighbor, and unless the neighbor is a leaf you can move from there to a different neighbor and go on. Since there are no cycles and the tree is finite you must reach a leaf. Of course you describe the argument in greater detail and it seems that everybody is happy.

Good.

Theorem: A tree T  with n vertices has n-1 edges.

After checking the basis for the induction we argue as follows: By the lemma T has a leaf v and once we delete v  and the edge containing it we are left with a graph T' on n-1 vertices. Now, T' has no cycles since T did not have any. It takes some effort to show that T' is connected. You describe it very carefully. Once this is done you know that T' is a tree as well and you can apply the induction hypothesis.

Student: Now what about the case where v is not a leaf?

(In square brackets what I and the students are thinking.)

Me: [I have been here before. There is no way out, just like getting to North Beacon street in Boston] You see, we proved that every tree has a vertex v which is a leaf, so we can use this vertex in the proof.

Student: Yes, we proved that, but what about the case where v is not a leaf?

Me: But I can assume that v is a leaf in the proof. I can choose v to be the leaf.

Student: You said several time that in a proof we have to check all the cases [yes, you can assume whatever you want, you are the teacher]. So what about the case where v is not a leaf.

Me: Look, I can handle the case where v is not a leaf…

Student: [At last. Now you are talking. Explain how you handle it and we can go home

Me: It is a bit complicated.

Many students: [So this is why you did not want to deal with it from the beginning; it is complicated.]

Some students realize that I can assume that v is a leaf but enjoy seeing the teacher sweating. Some students don't care. Some students believe that the truth, as usual, is somewhere in the middle.  

Me: But the main point in that I do not need to deal with this case. [pray hard now]

Student: [Here you go again] Why?

Me: Because in the proof we can assume that v is a leaf since we already proved that every tree has a leaf! Didn't we?

Student:  yes, yes.

Me: (victoriously) ) So we can choose v to be the leaf!!

Student (really victoriously) : And what about the case that v is not a leaf?!!

 


View Larger Map

Cisco Telepresence Magic

from www.youtube.com
Ref : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcfNC_x0VvE

Calvin and Hobbes for July 21, 2009

from Calvin and Hobbes (Unofficial)
Ref : http://www.ucomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/07/21/

Estimation

from xkcd.com
Ref : http://xkcd.com/612/

Calvin and Hobbes for July 18, 2009

from Calvin and Hobbes (Unofficial)
Ref : http://www.ucomics.com/calvinandhobbes/2009/07/18/

07/13/09 PHD comic: 'Great Tweets of Science'

from PHD Comics
Ref : http://www.phdcomics.com/comics.php?f=1198

Piled Higher & Deeper by Jorge Cham
www.phdcomics.com
title: "Great Tweets of Science" - originally published 7/13/2009

For the latest news in PHD Comics, CLICK HERE!

Sheeple

from xkcd.com
Ref : http://xkcd.com/610/

Hey, what are the odds -- five Ayn Rand fans on the same train!  Must be going to a convention.